Memory & Knowledge

Corrections and Feedback

How to teach Coppermind your preferences so it does not repeat the same mistakes across sessions.


Overview#

When Coppermind gets something wrong -- wrong tone in an email, wrong format for a deliverable, an assumption that does not match your style -- you can store a correction. That correction persists across sessions and gets injected into future context automatically.

Corrections compound over time. The more feedback you give, the better Coppermind understands how you work. Unlike a one-off instruction that disappears when the conversation ends, corrections are permanent rules that Coppermind follows every time.


When to Use This#

  • Coppermind uses the wrong tone or style for a client
  • A meeting prep format does not match how you actually run meetings
  • You notice a recurring mistake that you have corrected before in conversation
  • You want to establish a global rule that applies to all clients (e.g., "never use emojis in client emails")
  • A client has a specific preference that should always be followed (e.g., "Acme's CEO prefers bullet points over paragraphs")

Storing a Correction#

Just tell Coppermind what to do differently. You can be conversational:

"Remember this for next time: always use formal tone when writing emails to Acme's board members"

Or be explicit about scope:

"Store a correction: never include pricing in meeting agendas. This applies to all clients."
"Store a client correction for Acme: their fiscal year starts in July, not January. Adjust all quarterly references."

Each correction has:

  • Scope -- global (applies to all clients) or client (applies only to the active client)
  • Category -- optional grouping like "tone", "formatting", "process" (defaults to "general")
  • Weight -- how important the correction is, from 0.1 to 2.0. Corrections with weight 1.5 or higher are marked as critical and always appear first. Default is 1.0.
  • Context -- optional note about when or why the correction was created

Viewing Your Corrections#

To see all active corrections:

"Show my corrections"

To filter by scope:

"Show my global corrections"
"Show corrections for Acme"

To filter by category:

"Show my corrections in the formatting category"

Updating or Retiring a Correction#

If a correction is no longer relevant, you can deactivate it:

"Deactivate the correction about Acme's fiscal year"

Or update the text:

"Update my correction about email tone -- change it to: use a warm but professional tone, avoid slang"

You can also adjust the weight if a correction should be more or less prominent:

"Make the correction about board emails critical priority"

How Corrections Work Behind the Scenes#

Corrections are automatically injected into meeting prep, briefings, and other context-aware outputs. Coppermind follows a budget of roughly 500 tokens for corrections, which fits about 10 to 15 rules. The system prioritizes corrections by weight, so critical corrections always make the cut.

When a client-scoped correction overlaps with a global one (same category and similar text), the client-specific version takes priority. This lets you set global defaults and override them per client when needed.


Real-World Example#

Over time, you build up corrections:

Global: "Never use the word 'synergy' in any client communication"
Global: "Always include a one-line action summary at the top of meeting recaps"
Acme: "The CEO's name is Katherine, not Kathryn. She is particular about this."
Acme: "Their Q1 starts in July. Adjust all quarterly timelines accordingly."
BetaCorp: "They prefer Slack-style bullet updates over formal email prose"

Three weeks later, when you prep for an Acme meeting:
- Coppermind uses "Katherine" correctly
- The agenda avoids "synergy"
- Quarterly references align to July start
- The meeting recap has an action summary at the top

You never had to repeat any of those instructions.

Tips#

  • Correct in the moment. When you notice a mistake, store the correction right away. If you wait until later, you will forget.
  • Use client scope for client-specific preferences. Global corrections apply everywhere, which is powerful but can cause unexpected behavior if they are too specific.
  • Start with weight 1.0. Only escalate to critical (1.5+) for corrections that caused real problems, like getting a client's name wrong or using the wrong fiscal calendar.
  • Review corrections quarterly. Some corrections become outdated (a client changes their preferences, a process evolves). Run "show my corrections" periodically and deactivate anything that no longer applies.
  • Be specific. "Use better tone" is too vague to be useful. "Use formal language with no contractions when writing to Acme's legal team" gives Coppermind a clear rule to follow.

Ready to try this yourself?

Coppermind is free to start and runs inside Claude. Your first meeting prep will convince you.

Try Coppermind Free
Browse all guides →